منابع مشابه
Intellectualism and Psychology
Intellectualism – the thesis that know-how is a kind of knowthat – has proved difficult to assess by the traditional philosophical method of conceptual analysis. Recently, some authors have argued that we should instead look to results in psychology – specifically whether all procedural knowledge is declarative knowledge. I argue that such an approach is unsatisfactory, since the concepts emplo...
متن کاملDoxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology
Epistemic deontology is the view that the concept of epistemic justification is deontological: a justified belief is, by definition, an epistemically permissible belief. I defend this view against the argument from doxastic involuntarism, according to which our doxastic attitudes are not under our voluntary control, and thus are not proper objects for deontological evaluation. I argue that, in ...
متن کاملVolitionism and Voluntarism about Belief
1. Introduction In the discussions about belief and the will, two sorts of issues tend to be conflated. One is psychological: can we, as matter of psychological fact, believe something at will, or under the influence of motivational factors? The other is normative: should we, as a matter of normative guidance, believe things for which we have practical, or pragmatic reasons? This ambiguity is p...
متن کاملVoluntarism and realism in medieval ethics.
In contrast to other articles in this series on the history of moral philosophy the present essay is not devoted to expounding the views of a single author, or to examining a particular moral theory. Instead it discusses an important dispute between two medieval accounts of the relation between theological and moral propositions. In addition to its historical interest this debate is important b...
متن کاملNon-Linguistic Arguments for Intellectualism
Intellectualism about knowledge-how is the view that, in short, an agent’s knowing how to φ is grounded that agent’s propositional attitudes vis-à-vis φ-ing. Themost popular andwell-developed contemporary strategy for defending this position appeals, in the main, to linguistic considerations (e.g. Stanley &Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011), and consequently, the plausibility of intellectualism in ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychological Bulletin
سال: 1905
ISSN: 1939-1455,0033-2909
DOI: 10.1037/h0064506